similar cubes with rules inscription on windowsill in building

Welcome to the New Age: The Federalized Summary Judgment Standard Arrives in Florida – Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.510

For Florida lawyers, the landscape of civil litigation has shifted dramatically. Effective May 1, 2021, the Sunshine State embraced the federal summary judgment standard, significantly amending Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.510. This marks a significant change in how courts will resolve cases without trial. This blog post delves into the new standard, its implications for practitioners, and relevant Florida Rules of Court Procedure to navigate this exciting evolution.

The Old Standard: A Movant’s Mountain to Climb

Prior to the amendment, the summary judgment standard placed a heavy burden on the party seeking summary judgment (the “movant”). To prevail, the movant had to demonstrate the absence of any genuine issue of material fact, a near-impossible feat often described as “climbing a mountain.” This plaintiff-friendly standard often led to protracted litigation, even when the movant-defendant’s case appeared strong.

Enter the New Era: Aligning with the Federal Rules

The amended rule, Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.510, now mirrors the federal standard articulated in the “Celotex trilogy” of cases (Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., and Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp.). This means:

  • The focus shifts to whether a reasonable jury could find for the non-movant. No longer must the movant disprove the opponent’s case; instead, they need to show there’s insufficient evidence to support a jury verdict in the non-movant’s favor.
  • The non-movant faces a stronger burden. They must present evidence sufficient to create a genuine dispute on material facts – not simply raise a mere scintilla of doubt.
  • Judges must provide clearer reasoning. When granting or denying summary judgment, judges must articulate their rationale with specificity, ensuring transparency and guiding future decisions.

Implications for Florida Lawyers:

  • Movant’s strategy shift: Early case evaluation and meticulous evidence gathering become crucial. Identifying key facts and presenting them in a compelling narrative will be vital for success.
  • Non-movant’s response: Simply relying on past pleadings or boilerplate arguments won’t suffice. Proactive development of countervailing evidence and clear articulation of factual disputes are essential.
  • Discovery tactics: The new standard may influence discovery strategies, with a focus on obtaining evidence that directly addresses the elements of the claim or defense.

Other Relevant Florida Rules of Court Procedure

The below rules are just some of the rules that relevant when analyzing motions for summary judgment on either movant or non-movant side:

  • Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.110 (pleading standards): Emphasizing the importance of well-pleaded factual allegations, now more critical for surviving a summary judgment motion.
  • Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.340 (interrogatories): Framing interrogatories to pinpoint key facts and address potential material disputes becomes paramount.
  • Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.310 (oral depositions): Depositions must be strategically crafted to elicit evidence directly relevant to the potential summary judgment issues.


The new summary judgment standard marks a significant shift in Florida’s civil litigation landscape. While it presents challenges for both movants and non-movants, it also holds the potential for swifter, more efficient resolution of cases. By understanding the new standard, adapting their strategies, and utilizing relevant Florida Rules of Court Procedure, Florida lawyers can navigate this exciting new era and achieve success for their clients.

Remember, this blog post is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. Always consult with a qualified Florida attorney for specific legal guidance.

Call Us Skip to content